Home

Site Columnist

Modernwriter
Modernwriter
Content View Hits : 25025

Sign In



Latest Comments


Designed by:
SiteGround web hosting Joomla Templates

David Farland’s Daily Kick in the Pants—Oooh, baby! Writing Erotica!
David Farland
Written by David Farland   
Saturday, 10 July 2010 06:21

One writer from South Africa this morning asked me whether to use a pseudonym to write erotica. She said that at first she intended to do so, but then realized that she was proud of her work, and wanted to use the same name for all of her work.

My short bit of advice would be this: separate the lines! The first writer that I ever met was when I was a teen back in Oregon. He wrote for magazines and had twenty-six different names. His reasons? Some articles that he wrote were for women magazines like Redbook or general audiences in Reader’s Digest. Others were for religious magazines like the Christian Science Monitor, while others were high-end porn, and even others were of such hard-core nature that magazines like Playboy wouldn’t touch them.

He was definitely right. You might be proud of the quality of your work, but there may be works that you don’t want everyoneyour priest, your grandmother, your grandchildto read.

Now, having said that, I want to warn you about the problems that come with writing erotica. I recall talking to Fred Pohl, I believe it was, and he warned against it in no uncertain terms. He pointed out a respected author and says, "XXX is a fine writer, but all those years of writing porn has eroded his critical sensibilities. In his last book, he described a man making love to a woman and used the phrase ‘he split her to the core!’ No rational writer would do that."

 
David Farland’s Daily Kick in the Pants—The Virtues of the Incomplete Sentence
David Farland
Written by David Farland   
Monday, 05 July 2010 06:05
NewsAs many of you may know, Apple announced this week that they had sold three million iPads in the past 80 days. At this rate, they will become the biggest vendor of e-books by the end of the year. In order to compete, other vendors dropped their prices, so that you can now save a good chunk of change on the Barnes and Noble’s Nook, and on Amazon.com’s Kindle. I expect that the prices will drop and the e-readers will add new features as this price war heats up.

###

News
Last fall I decided to self-publish my book In the Company of Angels, and I promised to keep you apprised of how I fared on this venture. The book continues to do well, and I’ve earned back the costs of publishing and researching the book, so I’m now in the black. I’ve received very positive reviews on it. The last one said that it was "destined to become a classic," and of course the book recently won the Whitney Award for Best Novel of the Year. However, that leads to a problem: I’ve now sold all of my first print run and have only a couple of books left. I’m preparing to bring the book out in paperback, but want to make some editing changes and revisions before I do. I haven’t settled on a pub date for it yet.

###

David Farland’s Daily Kick in the Pants
The Virtues of the Incomplete Sentence

Last week, my wife picked up the novel SWEETHEARTS by Sara Zarr, and told me that it had "one of the most gripping openings I’ve ever seen." Intrigued, I had to look at it, too. It tells the story of a young girl in first person, and the opening sentences are all incomplete. (I’d use some examples, but I’d rather have you hunt down the book on your own. Sara is a wonderful writer.)

As children, we’re taught to write only in complete sentences, with subjects, verbs, and objects. That’s because teachers want you to be specific when you supply them with information. For example, if a teacher asks "How does water get from the mountains to the plains," my son would love to say, "Aquifers." But the teacher doesn’t know if he’s just throwing out a buzz word, or if he really understands what an aquifer is. So he demands a complete sentence as an answer.

Yet in the real world, we don’t talk in complete sentences. Here’s the way people really talk, at least in my neck of the woods:

"Hey, how ya doin’?"

"Not bad. You?"

"Can’t complain."

And so on. Yet very often, I’ll see new authors write all dialog in complete sentences. They might write like this:

"How are you doing, Joseph?"

"I’m fine, I suppose. How are you doing?"

"Well, I can’t complain."

Do you see how stilted and clunky that begins to sound after a few sentences? It’s freakin’ unnatural!

So when you write dialog in particular, full sentences should be optional. However, incomplete sentences can be used to excellent effect in description as well.

Years ago, I wanted to open a chapter with an image of stars. I wanted the reader to imagine looking up into a night sky, but not all night skies are created equal. When you’re in a city where light and pollution obscures your view, or on a night when the moon is out, your view of the stars is dimmed. So I decided to describe a night sky, with emphasis on stars. I wanted the reader to imagine a sky full of stars all at once. I wanted them to imagine a dark night, in the wilderness, where you look up at the sky and the sight takes your breath away, a night where you feel as if you can go walking safely by starlight. So I decided to begin with something like "Ten thousand stars glimmered in a moonless sky."

But I had a problem. You see, not all stars are created equal. Some very bright stars are prominent in your field of view on a moonless night, and they shine steadily. Darker stars might seem to waver or "twinkle" as their light is deflected by rising air currents. Still others might seem to throb. Darker or more distant stars might only be discerned as a sort of powder in the sky, brightening the heavens. So finding the perfect verb for the sentence troubled me. I didn’t want to write multiple sentences. I was hoping to hit the reader with the image instantly. Furthermore, since I edit syllabically, cutting out as many syllables as I can, I wanted my verb to be a single syllable if possible. "Glimmered" was too long.

Suddenly I realized that I could solve all of my problems by just cutting the verb altogether: "Ten thousand stars in a moonless sky." It seemed like a reasonable solution.

Of course, when it came to the critique, many in my reading group said, "Uh, Dave, you forgot to put a verb in this sentence!" But the poets in the group got it. I remember that Virginia Baker (author of the paranormal thriller JACK KNIFE), simply wrote the word "Perfect!" in the margin.

So it’s good to remember that you can often create stronger images without using complete sentences than if you do. As an imagistic technique, it can be very powerful and economical, allowing you to create a fragmented effect. For example, you might describe a murder scene like this:

"Pools of blood beneath Cindy’s head.

Red hair floating in gore.

Her pretty mouth wide in an eternal scream."

However, I tend to use the technique sparingly. If you overuse it, your prose will become very dense, very compact, and the reader might feel a bit overwhelmed.

Also, if you’re narrating the story in the voice of a character who frequently uses incomplete sentences, that’s a great tool, and can go a long way toward making your character sound natural. Here’s an example:

"Don’t know ‘bout this
tellin’ you my story and such. Gives me a pain. Head hurts just thinkin’ bout it. You know, pa stealin’ the neighbor’s chickens and all. . . ."

So the next time that you’re writing on your novel, try to forget most of what you learned in first grade about how to write in complete sentences.

###

Coming Events:

Professional Writer’s Workshop, July 6-11, SOLD OUT.

Writer’s Death Camp I, November 1-6, 2010 the Ultimate self-challenge for Nanowrimo month.

Writer’s Death Camp II, November 15-20 for those who can’t make it to the first one.

Million Dollar Outlines, March 7-12, 2011, very limited availability. To learn more about any of the above events, go to
www.davidfarland.net/writingworkshops.

If you have any questions or concerns, email This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Last Updated ( Monday, 05 July 2010 06:09 )
 
David Farland’s Daily Kick in the Pants—Describing the One Thing
David Farland
Written by David Farland   
Monday, 05 July 2010 06:00
In the past week, I’ve had several people ask me about writing descriptions. I’ve written articles on this before, but a recent manuscript got me to thinking about a general problemthe problem of trying to describe too many things at once. Many authors will try to describe groups of thingstrees in groves, crowds of peoples, packs of dogs. The problem is that we as readers can’t really imagine things very well in groups. For example, try to visualize the following sentence: "The angry mob moved toward the barricade."

Do you see anything? You should see a mob moving toward a barricade, right? But how is the mob dressed? What color of skin do its people have? What is the barricade made out of?

Would it help to know that the barricade is in Mexico City? Did your vision of the mob just change a little? Would it help to know that the mob is made up of wealthy people demanding that the government put an end to the kidnappings being carried out by drug lords in the city? Did their attire just change? What if told you that the mob was made up entirely of mothers?

How angry is angry? What if I told you that many of these women had tears streaming from their faces? What if I told you that some of them have children who are still missing, even after giving up their life’s fortunes in ransoms?

What of the barricade? What do you think its made of? Is it a wall of sandbags? What if I told you that it was a wall of burned-out cars? Or maybe it’s a wall of policemen in riot gear, carrying plastic shields.

It’s far more effective to be specific in these descriptions and to write about "one thing" instead of dozens. I can’t get you to visualize dozens of women at once, but I can get you to focus on one person, one action, and begin build from there:

Maria Villalobos, a regal woman in a red dress and high heels, raised her fist in the air, clutching a photo of her four-year-old daughter, a doe-eyed girl peering at the camera with a vague smile and innocent eyes. "We want our children back--" Maria cried as mascara streamed down her cheeks, "not just their body parts!" Maria hurled a leathery human ear toward the nearest police officer, who blocked her path to the police station with his riot shield. The ear bounced off his silver helmet and was trampled beneath his feet as the officer braced himself for a surge. Angry mothers, each as heartbroken as Maria, pounded against the riot shields chanting "Justice now! Justice now!"

Do you see the difference in your approach? Make one thing in that crowd come to life, just a bit, and you will begin to bring the whole group to life.

###

Coming Events:

Professional Writer’s Workshop, July 6-11, SOLD OUT.

Writer’s Death Camp I, November 1-6, 2010 the Ultimate self-challenge for Nanowrimo month.

Writer’s Death Camp II, November 15-20 for those who can’t make it to the first one.

Million Dollar Outlines, March 7-12, 2011, very limited availability. To learn more about any of the above events, go to
www.davidfarland.net/writingworkshops.

If you have any questions or concerns, email This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 
<< Start < Prev 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next > End >>

Page 24 of 68
Sign up for the Daily Kick here
Banner
Free Newsletter

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday63
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday107
mod_vvisit_counterThis week474
mod_vvisit_counterLast week624
mod_vvisit_counterThis month847
mod_vvisit_counterLast month2959
mod_vvisit_counterAll days42774

Online (20 minutes ago): 4
Your IP: 38.107.191.102
,
Today: Sep 08, 2010

Who's Online

We have 2 guests online

Advertisement

Search